Understanding permanent establishment (PE) rules is crucial for businesses engaged in cross-border activities. A recent private ruling by New Zealand’s Inland Revenue Department (IRD) sheds light on when overseas companies may be considered to have a PE in New Zealand. This article summarises the key points of this ruling and its implications for businesses.
What is a Permanent Establishment (PE)?
A PE refers to a fixed place of business where a foreign company conducts significant operations within a country. Its existence can make an overseas entity subject to local tax obligations.
Examples of a PE:
- A branch, office, or factory.
- A construction site lasting over a specific period.
- A dependent agent authorised to conclude contracts on the company’s behalf.
Why it matters: If your business is deemed to have a PE, it must pay income tax on New Zealand-sourced income.
Case Background: OS Co and NZ Co
Overview of the Arrangement:
- OS Co: An overseas company that supplies goods and technical services globally, including to customers in New Zealand.
- NZ Co: A New Zealand company contracted by OS Co to provide installation and maintenance services to New Zealand customers.
Key Facts:
- OS Co employees on temporary leave were employed directly by NZ Co under fixed-term contracts.
- OS Co paid NZ Co on a “cost-plus” basis for its services.
- OS Co had no head office or centre of management in New Zealand. Directors controlling the business from New Zealand. Access to or control over NZ Co’s premises.
- Head office or centre of management in New Zealand.
- Directors controlling the business from New Zealand.
- Access to or control over NZ Co’s premises.
- NZ Co operated independently and had no authority to act as a representative of OS Co.
Legal Questions Considered:
The IRD examined whether the arrangement:
- Made OS Co a “New Zealand resident” under section YA 1.
- Created a “permanent establishment” under section YD 4B.
- Resulted in OS Co having taxable New Zealand-sourced income.
- Involved tax avoidance under section BG 1.
Key Issues and Findings
1. Residence
The IRD concluded that OS Co was not a New Zealand resident because it did not meet any of the following conditions under section YD 2:
- Incorporation in New Zealand.
- Head office in New Zealand.
- Centre of management in New Zealand.
- Directors exercising control in New Zealand.
2. Permanent Establishment (PE)
The IRD assessed whether OS Co had a PE under the double tax agreement (DTA) and section YD 4B.
Key Findings:
- No fixed place of business: OS Co did not control or use NZ Co’s office or any customer premises.
- No dependent agent: NZ Co operated independently and lacked authority to conclude contracts on behalf of OS Co.
- Auxiliary activities: NZ Co’s activities for OS Co were considered supportive rather than core income-generating operations.
Conclusion: OS Co did not have a PE in New Zealand under the DTA or section YD 4B.
3. Taxable New Zealand Income
The IRD ruled that OS Co’s income was not New Zealand-sourced income under section YD 4. Therefore, OS Co was not subject to New Zealand income tax on the activities performed by NZ Co.
4. Tax Avoidance
The arrangement between OS Co and NZ Co was not deemed a tax avoidance arrangement under section BG 1.
Practical Takeaways for Businesses
1. Clearly Define Relationships with Contractors:
- Use independent contractor agreements.
- Avoid granting authority to conclude contracts or control premises.
2. Document Cross-Border Arrangements Thoroughly:
- Contracts and business models should clarify roles to mitigate tax risks.
3. Seek Professional Tax Advice:
- Tax laws and DTAs are complex. Consult experts to ensure compliance.
4. Monitor Regulatory Changes:
- Regularly review tax obligations for cross-border operations.
The IRD’s ruling demonstrates the importance of properly structuring international business arrangements. By maintaining clear distinctions between independent contractors and dependent agents, businesses can avoid inadvertently creating a permanent establishment and its associated tax obligations.
For personalised advice on cross-border tax compliance, contact Black Arrow Business Studio. Our expert team can help you navigate the complexities of international taxation.
For more details, read the full ruling here: TDS 24/20 Permanent Establishment Ruling.
Source: IRD
Are you struggling with accounting and business management for your business? We are here to help! Get in touch with us to discuss how our expert services can support your business’s success. Contact us today to schedule a free consultation and see how we can add value to your operations. Please find us on Facebook | Linkedin | Instagram – Follow us and give us a like to see more updates and news.